Legal Opinion
In re Macloskey
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided July 25, 1946No. 2592PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FORMAN, District Judge.
Petitioner, creditor of the bankrupt, requested the trustee to bring suit under Section 70, sub. e, of the Bankruptcy Act, 11 U.S.C.A. § 110, sub. e, against the bankrupt, Evelyn Croft, Annie Croft, Virginia A. Macloskey, Mary Christine Macloskey, relatives of the bankrupt, and Gem Products Sales Company to set aside alleged fraudulent transfers and conveyances. Indemnity against costs of litigation was and still is offered. The trustee declined to sue, and thereupon the matter was brought before the Referee on petition for an order directing the trustee to sue or, in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Trimble v. WoodheadSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- In re Meadows, Williams & Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1910
- Casey v. BakerDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1914
- In re BaileyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1907
3Cited by9 opinions
- Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Cybergenics Corp. Ex Rel. Cybergenics Corp. v. ChineryCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- Hansen v. Finn (In Re Curry & Sorensen, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- The Official Committee Of Unsecured Creditors Of Cybergenics Corporation v. Kathleen ChineryCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- L.B. Cleveland, Inc. v. Bluestone (In Re Bluestone)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1989
- Matter of Abingdon Realty Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.