San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace v. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the United States of America
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
2Per curiam
Upon consideration of petitioners’ motion for leave to file exhibits in support of the suggestion for rehearing en banc, the responses thereto, and of the suggestion for rehearing en banc, it is
ORDERED, by the Court en banc, that the motion for leave to file exhibits is granted, and it is
FURTHER ORDERED, by the Court en banc, that petitioners’ suggestion for rehearing en banc is granted in part, and it is
FURTHER ORDERED, by the Court en banc, that only Section III.B of the Court’s opinion, 751 F.2d 1287 and the corresponding part of the judgment of the Court, issued on December 31, 1984,…
3Cited by34 opinions
- Cuomo v. United States Nuclear Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
- Limerick Ecology Action, Inc. v. United States Nuclear Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Kent County, Delaware Levy Court v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
- Ammex, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1999
- Blue Ridge Environmental Defense League v. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.