Legal Opinion
City of Utica v. County of Oneida
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 4, 1946PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCross, J.
The primary motion made by all defendants asks for judgment on the pleadings dismissing, the complaint on the ground that it does not allege facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. Upon the argument, it was stipulated in open court by all counsel representing all parties that the motion be confined to the complaint alone.
The decision on this motion, which was argued July 8, 1946, was held in, abeyance pending the filing of briefs by the various counsel. During that interlude a motion was brought on before the court, September 3, 1946, upon, an order to show cause, granted upon the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- City of Trenton v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Williams v. Mayor of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Wisconsin & Michigan Railway Co. v. PowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- New Orleans v. New Orleans Water Works Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- City of Worcester v. Worcester Consolidated Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Faltynowicz v. Battery Park City Auth. (In re World Trade Ctr. Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litig.)Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 2017
- Montecalvo v. City of UticaNew York Supreme Court · 1996
- The Matter of World Trade Center Lower Manhattan Disaster , Site Litigation.New York Court of Appeals · 2017