Legal Opinion

Village of Ponca v. Crawford

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1888PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Error to the district court for Dixon county. Tried below before Crawford, J. on inadmissibility of evidence, cited: Birdsatt, Son & Go. v. Garter, 5 Neb., 517. Murphy v. Lyons, 19 Id., 689. Contributory negligence. Omaha Horse Railway v. Doolittle, 7 Neb., 481. Williams v. R. R., 2 Mich., 259. Oity of Erie v. Magill, 101 Penn. State, 621. "Verdict. Thomas v. Dickenson, 12 N. Y.,. 364. Giinnell v. Phillips, 1 Mass., 541. Shobe v. Bell, 1 Randolph, 39.

1Opinion of the CourtCobb, J.

The cause was before this court on the record of a former-trial in the district court of Dixon county, when the judgment was reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings, in case reported in 18 Neb., p. 551.

From the record now before us, it appears that, upon the *664cause again coming up in the distl’iet court, the defendant on leave filed an amended answer. The plaintiff’s cause of action, as set out in his petition, being for personal injuries suffered within the corporate limits of the defendant, village of Ponca, by the plaintiff falling off the end of an elevated sidewalk, over…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dana v. TuckerNew York Supreme Court · 1809
  2. Barton v. HolmesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1864
  3. Dunn v. HallIndiana Supreme Court · 1846

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Killion v. DinklageNebraska Supreme Court · 1931
  2. City of Michigan City v. BoecklingIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. McGuire v. ThompsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Empson Packing Co. v. VaughnSupreme Court of Colorado · 1899
  5. Pinches v. Village of DickensNebraska Supreme Court · 1934

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API