Legal Opinion

Ching On v. Amana

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 1886PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Ejectment.

1Opinion of the Court

Decision of

Judd, C.J.

This is an action of ejectment for the possession of two tracts of land situated at Waimalu, Ewa, Oahu, embraced in Royal Patent No. 4472, to one Kamanaoulani, containing 42.65 acres.

To the complaint Hopai Yet pleaded the general issue. Amana was defaulted; but, by consent, default was taken off, and he. answered during the trial, disclaiming as to the portion of the premises in possession of Hopai Yet; and as to the rest of the land he pleaded the general issue.

The point is made that the defendants having been sued jointly, judgment cannot be rendered against them…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fisher v. . HepburnNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. Jackson v. WoodsNew York Supreme Court · 1810

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Castle v. Kapiolani Estate, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Kaehu v. NamealohaHawaii Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Moranho v. De AguiarHawaii Supreme Court · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API