Legal Opinion
American Central Insurance v. Hagerty
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 15, 1897PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Agtion against insurance agents for disobedience of orders to camcel a policy.
1Opinion of the CourtForbes, J.
This is an action to recover damages for an alleged-disobedience of instructions, in failing to cancel a policy of insurance, Ho. 450825, which was issued by the defendants to Phillips and Cásey, June 29, 1891, while the defendants were acting as the local agents of the plaintiff at Plattsburg, Hew York.
This action was commenced in December, 1892, and was formerly tried at the Chenango circuit in March, 1894. At the close of the. evidence, a verdict was directed for the plaintiff for $1,162.31, and' á judgment was entered thereon the 2'6th day'of March, 1894.
An appeal was taken by the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Whelan v. . LynchNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Cox v. . PearceNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- American Cent. Insurance v. HagertyNew York Supreme Court · 1895
- Powers v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaNew York Supreme Court · 1894
- Smith v. BabcockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Continental Insurance v. Clark & CresslerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
- Phoenix Insurance v. ThomasWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1927
- Lipstein v. 20X Hospitality LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2024
- Union Square Limited v. Mr. Bar-B-Q Products LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022