Legal Opinion

Reynolds & Reynolds Co. v. Goldsmith Motor Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 1, 1998PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action, inter alia, to recover money due under a contract, the defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Price, J.), dated April 11, 1997, as stayed its counterclaims and directed the parties to proceed to arbitration on the counterclaims.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the Supreme Court properly concluded that the plaintiff did not waive its right to arbitration of the defendant’s counterclaims. The counterclaims are clearly encompassed by the parties’ arbitration…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Leadertex, Inc. v. Morganton Dyeing & Finishing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  3. Weight Watchers of Quebec Ltd. v. Weight Watchers International, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1975

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Flynn v. Labor Ready, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. Fein v. General Electric Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  3. Willer v. KleinmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  4. Willer v. KleinmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API