Legal Opinion

People v. Rice

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 9, 1966PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment affirmed.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan and Keating. Judges Fuld and Van Voorhis dissent and vote to reverse and to dismiss the complaint in the following memorandum: Evidence that defendant uttered the obscenities testified to, whatever other offense or crime it may have estab lished, does not, in our opinion, make out or constitute the crime of endangering the morals of a minor in violation of subdivision 2 of section 483 of the Penal Law.

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. SuarezNew York Supreme Court · 1986
  2. People v. DoeCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1987
  3. People v. VillacisNew York Supreme Court · 1989
  4. People v. RiosCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1989
  5. People v. PoplaskiNassau County District Court · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API