Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Aetna Life Insurance v. Penn

Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati

Decided April 15, 1906Published

1Concurrence

Iíosea, J.;

Hoffheimer, J., and Littleford, J., concur.

Heard on motion to remand for amendment, by adding parties.

The defendant in error, upon oral announcement-of the court’s opinion heretofore rendered and before entry of judgment, moves the court, in accordance with the finding that the proper parties are not before it, to permit the beneficiaries to be made parties and to remand the cause for this purpose. Counsel admits the correctness of the conclusions reached by the court as matter of law, but claims that as these go to the remedy only, the error of the plaintiff below in respect of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Galliher v. CadwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Central Bank of Washington v. HumeSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Abell v. Penn Mutual Life InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Ripley v. SeligmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Leonard v. SweetzerOhio Supreme Court · 1847

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API