Legal Opinion

Sturz v. Fischer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 15, 1897PublishedCited by 1 opinion

- Appeal by the defendant, Frederick S. Fischer,.from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the pláintiff, entered in .the office of the clerk of the county of Hew York on .the 16th day of -Janm ary, 189% upon the verdict of a jury, and also from- an order bearing date,the loth day of January,.. 189% and entered.-in said.clerk’s office, denying, the.'defendant’s motion for a new trial made upon the minutes.

1Opinion of the Court

Parker, J. :

This is an action for goods sold and delivered.- As matter of defense the defendant alleged in his answer, and proved' upon the trial, that the plaintiff extended the time of payment of such indebtedness, and to that end accepted defendant’s several notes, the face.value of which aggregated the amount of defendant’s indebtedness ; and that'not one of such notes had matured at the time of the commencement of this action. The -action was, therefore^ prematurely brought. (Martens-Turner Company v. Machintosh, 17 App. Div. 419.)

The judgment should be reversed and a new trial ordered,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Martens-Turner Co. v. MackintoshAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Miller v. MyersNew York Supreme Court · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API