Legal Opinion

Dam v. Kirke La Shelle Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided December 12, 1908PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAZEL, District Judge.

This suit in equity was brought to restrain the defendant, the Kirke La Shelle Company, from producing or publicly performing the dramatic play or composition entitled “The Heir to the Hoorah.” The bill alleges that the play is an unauthorized dramatization of the published story entitled “The Transmogrification of Dan.”

It is first to be considered herein whether the story was protected by statutory copyright. Complainant’s intestate, who was the author of the story, sold it to the Ess Ess.Publishing Company, which later published the story, with other articles, in its…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Emerson v. DaviesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1845
  2. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. OsbornCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Golding v. R.K.O. Pictures, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Manning v. Miller Music CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1959
  3. Fitch v. YoungDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1916
  4. International Film Service Co. v. Affiliated Distributors, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1922
  5. Golding v. R.K.O. Pictures, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API