Legal Opinion

Haakon County v. Brunswick Corp.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 1971No. File No. 10843PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

COOPER, Circuit Judge.

Appellant is the vendor under a conditional sales contract dated February 20, 1963, under which bowling equipment was sold to Bowl Mor Lanes, Inc., of Philip, South Dakota. Personal property taxes assessed to Bowl Mor Lanes based on the value of the bowling equipment for the years 1966-1969, inclusive, were not paid. Appellant repossessed the bowling equipment November 23, 1969. On November 25, 1969, the county treasurer, after changing the assessment rolls to name appellant as owner of the bowling equipment, issued a distress warrant against the property to collect the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. WhitfieldSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. First Federal Savings Bank v. TrolingerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API