Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Burkhalter

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 19, 1972No. S. C. 71PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLEMAN, Justice.

Complainants appeal from an adverse decree in a suit to quiet title to land.

On motion by complainants, the trial court heard testimony ore tenus on two occasions; to wit, January 12, 1971, and February 9, 1971.

Ten witnesses testified on the hearings. The transcript of their testimony is set out on forty-five transcript pages. Approximately thirty exhibits were received in evidence.

Appellants’ Statement of the Facts is set out on two and one-half pages of their brief. Appellants’ Statement of the Facts does not contain a condensed recital of the evidence given by each witness…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. HollandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  2. Alabama Power Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  3. Morgan County v. HillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
  4. Standard Oil Company v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1964
  5. Beck v. BeckSupreme Court of Alabama · 1971

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mayhall v. SwaffordCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1975
  2. East v. CitranoCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1973
  3. Aday v. AdayCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1972
  4. Campbell v. Water Wks. Gas Bd. of Town of Red BaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
  5. Massey v. ClayCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API