Legal Opinion
Molnar-Szilasi v. SEARS ROEBUCK AND CO.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided April 27, 2006No. Civil RWT 06-34PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
TITUS, District Judge.
On August 9, 2005, Plaintiff Agneta Molnar-Szilasi (“Molnar-Szilasi”) filed an action in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County, Maryland, alleging that she was injured by a defective Sears Craftsman riding lawnmower. Defendant Sears Roebuck and Co. (“Sears”) was served on December 7, 2005, and on January 7, 2006, removed the suit to this Court based on diversity of citizenship, 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Molnar-Szilasi subsequently filed a Motion to Remand, alleging that the Notice of Removal was improper because it failed to properly and fully allege…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Mildred MARSHALL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MANVILLE SALES CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee, and Robert L. Mason, DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
- Kinney v. Columbia Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Mulcahey v. Columbia Organic Chemicals Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
- Mason v. International Business MacHines, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1982
- Southern Pacific Co. v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Beeman, et al. v. The Shredder Co., LLC, et al.District Court, D. Maryland · 2025