Legal Opinion

Purvin v. Grey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 28, 1944PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

On plaintiff’s appeal the order appealed from should be affirmed. The order insofar as it denies defendants’ motion to strike out certain allegations should also be affirmed.

Defendants’ appeal from the denial of their motion to dismiss the first cause of action for insufficiency should be dismissed without costs as it is academic in view of our decision in the companion appeal (Purvin v. Grey, post, p. 815, decided herewith), affirming an order dismissing the first cause of action.

As we read the allegations of the third cause of action there is no allegation that the property withdrawn and…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Purvin v. GreyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
  2. Purvin v. GreyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API