Legal Opinion

Fahrney v. Kelly

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Arkansas

Decided May 21, 1900PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Chancery.

1Opinion of the Court

ROGERS, District Judge.

The facts in this case which are important to its decision are these: In the .year 1896 the complainant, William H. Eahrney, by various transfers from the defendant W. J. Kelly, became the owner of $287,500 of the capital stock of. the White Cliffs Portland Cement & Chalk Company, one of the defendants in this suit. It appears that this stock had been transferred as a bonus by William J. Kelly to the complainant, William H. Eahrney, and other members of the Fahrney family, and others, who had become purchasers of certain bonds of the defendant company, and the proceeds…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Graffam v. BurgessSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Byers v. SurgetSupreme Court of the United States · 1857
  3. United States v. Libellants & of the Schooner AmistadSupreme Court of the United States · 1841
  4. Sims v. CumbySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1890
  5. United States v. SteenersonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1892

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Stroud v. HendersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
  2. Coulter v. FahrneyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
  3. Fahrney v. CoulterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API