Legal Opinion

Teller v. People

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 15, 1884PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court of Denver.

1Per curiam

The motion to dismiss the appeal must he allowed upon the ground that no appeal lies from a judgment imposing a penalty for a contempt of court.

The cases of Ex parte Crittenden, 62 Cal. 534, and New Orleans v. Steamship Co. 20 Wall. 392, are conclusive upon the point that the imposition of fines and penalties in contempt proceedings pertains to criminal, and not civil jurisprudence.

In our judgment the proceedings in cases of this character partake sufficiently of the nature of criminal actions to warrant us in holding that they must be reviewed as such. Inasmuch, therefore, as appeals do not…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. New Orleans v. Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Ex parte CrittendenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Cooper v. People Ex Rel. WyattSupreme Court of Colorado · 1889
  2. Wyatt v. the PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1892
  3. People ex rel. Attorney General v. News-Times Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1906
  4. Dockerty v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1935
  5. Bloom v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1897

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API