Legal Opinion
United States v. David Duvall
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided August 13, 2013No. 10-3091, 11-3114PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
2Per curiam
Upon consideration of appellant’s petition for rehearing en banc, the response thereto, and the absence of a request by any member of the court for a vote, it is
ORDERED that the petition be denied.
3ConcurrenceRogers, Circuit Judge
I write regarding Judge Kavanaugh’s critique today of a related case, United States v. Epps, 707 F.3d 337 (D.C.Cir.2013). Our decision in Epps adhered to the interpretation of Marks v. United States, 430 U.S. 188, 97 S.Ct. 990, 51 L.Ed.2d 260 (1977), adopted by the en banc court in King v. Palmer, 950 F.2d 771 (D.C.Cir.1991), which is binding on the court. See LaShawn A. v. Barry, 87 F.3d 1389,…
4Cases cited15 opinions
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Gardner v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- O'Dell v. NetherlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
5Cited by30 opinions
- Ramos v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
- Ramos v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
- Yasser Abbas v. Foreign Policy Group, LLCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
- Manning v. Caldwell for City of RoanokeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
- Corcamore, LLC v. Sfm, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.