Legal Opinion
Spring Street Associates v. Reardon
Civil Court of the City of New York
Decided March 1, 1990Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Peter Tom, J.
The issue raised in the motion before the court is whether the protective application of the Loft Law may be invoked by a commercial tenant.
Petitioner brings the instant nonpayment proceeding against respondent who operates a hairdressing salon on the second floor of the building. The subject building was registered with the Loft Board as an interim multiple dwelling in 1983 and contains 3 residential and 2 commercial units. Respondent is one of the commercial tenants in the building.
*889Respondent moves, among other grounds, to dismiss the petition upon the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lower Manhattan Loft Tenants v. New York City Loft BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Anthony v. New York City Loft BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- 902 Associates, Ltd. v. Total Picture Creative Services, Inc.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1989
- Dalo v. New York City Loft BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Tysons Associates v. Tribeca Audio Research Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1988