Legal Opinion
Amato v. Porter
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided October 26, 1946No. 3360PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUXMAN, Circuit Judge,
delivered the
opinion of the court.
The appellant, Marion M. Amato, is a wholesale distributor of bananas in Denver, Colorado. As such, he was subject to the Office of Price Administration Act, 1 and to the regulations of the Administrator promulgated thereunder. The administrator instituted an action against him in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado for treble damages under Sec. 205 (e) of the Act, as amended, alleging overcharges on sales of bananas. The action was prosecuted on evidence adduced by the Administrator from an examination of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Marcus v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Wilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Heike v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Bowles v. Beatrice Creamery Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944
- Bowles v. AmatoDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1945
3Cited by15 opinions
- Manning Engineering, Inc. v. Hudson County Park CommissionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
- Allred v. GravesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Woods v. RobbCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1948
- National Brass Works, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
- Stephen M. Speers, Jerry D. Anden, and James v. Sidary, A/K/A Jim Sidney v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.