Fred MacDonald v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Appellant Fred Kenneth MacDonald (“MacDonald”) appeals the district court’s denial of his Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion to reopen his case, vacate his voluntary dismissal without prejudice, and enter a new dismissal with prejudice. A district court’s denial of a Rule 60(b) motion is a final, appealable order. Griffin v. Gomez, 741 F.3d 10, 25 (9th Cir. 2014). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review the district court’s denial of a Rule 60(b) motion for an abuse of discretion, Lemoge v. United States, 587 F.3d 1188, 1191-92 (9th Cir. 2009), and we…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lemoge v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Elizabeth Albright Latshaw v. Trainer Wortham & Company, Inc., a Corporation Robert J. Vile, a Natural PersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Debbie Floyd v. Larry Laws, and City of Sherwood, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Jerry L. Engleson v. Burlington Northern Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Michael Joseph Molloy v. Mark WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Drevaleva v. HayoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2023