Legal Opinion

United States v. Stepney

District Court, N.D. California

Decided February 11, 2003No. CR 01-0344 MHPPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

re Joint Defense Agreements

PATEL, Chief Judge.

Defendants have been charged with conspiracy and numerous violations of federal drug and weapons laws. In a previous order, this court required that all joint defense agreements be put into writing and submitted to the court. Counsel for defendants submitted proposed joint defense agreements for in camera review. Having reviewed the proposed joint defense agreements and having heard arguments from defendants on this matter, and for the reasons stated below, the court issues the following order.

BACKGROUND

Defendants are charged…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. United States v. HastingSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Wheat v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Mickens v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States v. GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  2. Xl Specialty Insurance v. Level Global InvestorsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
  3. United States v. AlmeidaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
  4. Roosevelt Irrigation District v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power DistrictDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2011
  5. United States v. LeCroyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2005

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API