Legal Opinion

People ex rel. King v. McNeill

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 16, 1961PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJames D. Hopkins, J.

An application has been made ex parte by the petitioner for an order directing that subpoenas for witnesses to be called by the petitioner in a pending habeas corpus proceeding be served by a Sheriff or other person designated by the court, and that the expense thereof be paid out of court funds of Sullivan County. The petitioner is an inmate of Matteawan State Hospital under an order of commitment of the Supreme Court, Sullivan County; the pending habeas corpus proceeding has been brought by the petitioner to end his restraint in the State institution.

The petitioner’s papers are not in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Weinstein v. FrankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  2. LaBarbera v. Hart & Crouse Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
  3. Schechter v. LichtensteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
  4. Pankawicus v. Nichols Copper Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
  5. Robertson v. SchoonmakerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Guardianship of the Person & Custody of Mark V.New York Surrogate's Court · 1975
  2. In re North Country Legal Services, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Brown v. WymanNew York Supreme Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API