Bi-Lo, Inc. v. Stanciel
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Bell, Chief Judge.
This is a suit for malicious prosecution which arose out of defendant’s causing the arrest of plaintiff pursuant to warrant for the crime of issuing and uttering a worthless check. A jury returned a verdict for plaintiff and judgment was entered. Held:
1. The court denied defendant’s motion for directed verdict. The essential elements of this tort are: "A criminal prosecution, maliciously carried on, and without any probable cause, whereby damage ensues to the person prosecuted, shall give him a cause of action.” Code § 105-801. Defendant contends that the evidence demands…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. KingCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- Sanfrantello v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
- Johnson v. Monumental Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Baird v. CollierCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
3Cited by8 opinions
- Melton v. LaCalamitoCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- Wilson v. BonnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- Voliton v. Piggly WigglyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
- McMillan v. Day Realty Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- Nicholl v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.