Legal Opinion

Jack v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 9, 1982No. Appeal, No. 2180 C.D. 1980PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

President Judge Crumlish, Jr.,

Clyde Jack appeals an Unemployment Compensation Board of Review order which affirmed the referee ’s denial of benefits.1 We affirm.

Jack, a furniture designer and supervisor of the employer’s mill room, voluntarily quit after becoming dissatisfied with working conditions and his employer ’s failure to promote a new product line he had designed.

Section 402(b)(1) of the Unemployment Compensation Law2 provides that a claimant will be ineligible for benefits for any week “ [i]n which his unemployment is due to voluntarily leaving work without cause of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Ruckstuhl v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Rinehart v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. McKeown v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Yazevac v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Peak v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Ellis v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Peak v. COM., UNEMPLOYMENT COMP. BD.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API