Legal Opinion

McCoun v. Dorsheimer

New York Court of Chancery

Decided December 15, 1839PublishedCited by 2 opinions

The facts in this case will sufficiently appear from the Vice Chancellor’s opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

The Vice Chancellor.

It was stated on the argument that the bill in this cause was a creditor’s bill in the common form, against the defendants, but I do not find among the papers left with me, either a copy of the bill or of the injunction issued upon filing it. Two propositions are now presented upon different motions.

1st. To dissolve the injunction issued upon the original bill, upon the coming in of Dorsheimer’s answer. 2d. For leave to the complainants to file a supplemental bill and for an injunction.

The defendant, Dorsheimer, is post-master at the city of Buffalo, at a salary of $2,000…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Campbell v. GenetNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1859
  2. Caton v. SouthwellNew York Supreme Court · 1851

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API