Claflin v. Wilson
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Linn District Coxwi. Action in chancery. There was a decree in the District Court granting the relief jirayed for by plaintiff. Defendant Davis appeals. The facts of the case appear in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Beck, Ch. J.
— I. The petition alleges that defendant Wilson made to plaintiff three promissory notes, and executed a mortgage to secure their payment; that the note first falling duo was by plaintiff, in the ordinary course of business, in*16dorsed for collection, and by Wilson, or by some one for him, duly paid, and that defendant Davis, claiming that he had' bought the first note, instituted an action to foreclose the mortgage and recovered a decree thereon, and caused the lands to be sold, upon an execution. He and his attorney in the case became purchasers, and received a certificate of…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Central Railroad v. First National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884
- Bank of the Metropolis v. First Nat. Bank of Jersey CityU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1884
- National Bank of Commerce v. JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
- Standard Sanitary Manufacturing Co. v. StumpCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
- Chismore v. Marion Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1936
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.