Smith v. Tri-State Transit Co. of La
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
TALIAFERRO, Judge.
Rehearings were granted in these cases to the end that further consideration might be given them because, principally, the court was divided on the paramount question of fact involved, and to reach the conclusion arrived at by the majority, the lower court’s "finding on questions of fact had to be reversed. The record has again been closely studied, resulting in a confirmation of the conclusions heretofore adopted, and which form the bases of our judgments. The well-recognized rule that great weight should be accredited to the trial judge’s fact findings should not have the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Smith v. Tri-State Transit of LouisianaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1936
3Cited by5 opinions
- Koch Engineering Co. v. FaulconerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1986
- Fulmer v. United States Fidelity Guaranty Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1941
- LaFleur v. Boyce MacHinery CorporationLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1973
- Demby v. PlischkeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1949
- Gagliano v. CooperLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962