Upshaw v. Debow
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Case 17 — PETITION EQUITY APPEAL PROM PULTON CIRCUIT COURT. CITED 15 B. Monroe, 517, Campbell v. Hillman. 3Duvall, 156, Warrin v. Barker & Co. 3 Dana, 374, Williams v. Rogers. cited 1 Marshall, 500, Shackelford v. Handley's ex’r. 4 Howard (Miss.) 435, Parham v. Randolph. 1 McCord, 131, Tunno v. Mood. 8 Paige, 813, Marvin v. Bennett. 5 Binney, 355, 363, Stoddart v. Smith. 9 Johnson, 465, Waters v: Travis.
Read the full summary
Case 17 — PETITION EQUITY APPEAL PROM PULTON CIRCUIT COURT. CITED 15 B. Monroe, 517, Campbell v. Hillman. 3Duvall, 156, Warrin v. Barker & Co. 3 Dana, 374, Williams v. Rogers. cited 1 Marshall, 500, Shackelford v. Handley's ex’r. 4 Howard (Miss.) 435, Parham v. Randolph. 1 McCord, 131, Tunno v. Mood. 8 Paige, 813, Marvin v. Bennett. 5 Binney, 355, 363, Stoddart v. Smith. 9 Johnson, 465, Waters v: Travis. Kent, 6th ed., 475, 576. Sugden on Vendors, side-pages 357, 358, 371, 373. Printed Decisions, 116, Damils v. Pogue.
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGE PETERS
delivered the opinion op the court.
This suit in equity was brought by tbe personal representative of Thos. R. Upshaw against S. L. Debow to subject a tract of land in Fulton County to sale to pay an unsatisfied balance of the purchase-money.
It is alleged in the petition that decedent, on December 25, 1860, sold to tbe defendant tbe south-east and soutli-west quarters of section 4, of township 1, range 6, west; and tbe south-east fractional quarter of section 5, township 1, range 6, west; for four thousand five hundred dollars — three thousand of which was paid down, and a note…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Thomas v. BealsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
- Wheeler v. BaarsSupreme Court of Florida · 1894
- English v. ThomassonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1884
- Sellards v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
- Goatley v. HarmonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.