Legal Opinion

State ex rel. School District No. 301 v. Preston

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 1915No. 12546PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Application filed in the supreme court January 13, 1915, for a writ of mandamus to compel the state superintendent of public instruction to apportion certain current school funds.

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

School District No. 301 of Whatcom county seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the respondent, as state superintendent of public instruction, to apportion the current school funds of this state, to Whatcom county and to district No. 301, upon the basis of the actual days of school attendance as shown by the last annual report of the county superintendent of schools of Whatcom county.

It is alleged that the respondent, in making the apportionment of school funds in the month of October, 1914, arbitrarily reduced the school attendance of relator district five days for each and every pupil…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Case v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Alaska Coast Co. v. Alaska Barge Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
  3. School District Number Two v. LambertOregon Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Great Northern Railway Co. v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Clark v. ClineSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. El Centro de la Raza v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2018
  2. El Centro de la Raza v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2018
  3. State ex rel. Seattle School District No. 1 v. PrestonWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  4. State ex rel. Seattle School District No. 1 v. PrestonWashington Supreme Court · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API