Drinkard v. Hall
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBrown, Justice
I concur in the opinion of the majority insofar as it holds that the filing of the claim of lien was in compliance with the statute and was sufficient to create a lien-on both of the-properties.
I also concur that the bill should allege the cost of the material, woidc and labor furnished for each of said properties which must carry their own burden.
But I am of opinion that the bill was well filed and that the Cullman Circuit Court, in: Equity, acquired jurisdiction, not only to enforce the liens separately on each of said' properties and, if the lien failed for any purpose, could render a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- South & North Alabama Railroad v. Henlein & BarrSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
- McNeil v. Ritter Dental Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1925
- Thomas v. Board of TrusteesIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
- Lockhart v. O'NealSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
- Ford v. HendersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.