Pierson v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PHILLIPS, Judge.
This is an appeal from a conviction for a capital murder. Punishment is death.
Appellant raises fifteen grounds of error. We deal only with his contentions that two prospective jurors were excused for cause in violation of his right to an impartial jury and due process of law under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments. See Witherspoon v. Illinois, 391 U.S. 510, 88 S.Ct. 1770, 20 L.Ed.2d 776 (1968). Because the record reflects that both jurors were improperly excused, we reverse appellant’s conviction.
Prospective juror William Graham initially testified that he was opposed…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Adams v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Davis v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- The People v. SpeckIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. ForcellaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1968
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Bridge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Clark v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Farris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Franklin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Riley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.