Legal Opinion

Pierson v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 29, 1981No. 63437PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PHILLIPS, Judge.

This is an appeal from a conviction for a capital murder. Punishment is death.

Appellant raises fifteen grounds of error. We deal only with his contentions that two prospective jurors were excused for cause in violation of his right to an impartial jury and due process of law under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments. See Witherspoon v. Illinois, 391 U.S. 510, 88 S.Ct. 1770, 20 L.Ed.2d 776 (1968). Because the record reflects that both jurors were improperly excused, we reverse appellant’s conviction.

Prospective juror William Graham initially testified that he was opposed…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Adams v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Davis v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. The People v. SpeckIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
  5. State v. ForcellaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1968

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Bridge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  2. Clark v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  3. Farris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  4. Franklin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  5. Riley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API