United States v. Shriver
District Court, S.D. Illinois
Indictment for carrying on business of retail liquor dealer at Fair-field, Illinois, without payment of special tax.
1Opinion of the CourtTreat, J.
The defendant is indicted for carrying on the business of a retail liquor dealer at Fairfield, Illinois, without having paid the special tax required by the laws of the United States. It appears that his residence and regular place of business were at Shawneetown, Illinois, where he carried on business as wholesale and retail liquor dealer, having paid his special tax as such; and so far as his business was carried on there, it appears to have been in strict accordance with the law. But it appears that he went to Fairfield, Illinois, to solicit trade, taking with him samples of his liquors…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Pilgreen v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bruce v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
- State v. RosenbergerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
- United States v. Adams Exp. Co.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1902
- De Bary v. DunneU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · 1909
- United States v. ChevallierCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1901
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.