Legal Opinion

Neil v. Bunn

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 15, 1877PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Usury. Contracts. Promissory Notes. Before Judge Underwood. Polk Superior Court. February Term, 1876. Reported in tbe opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Jackson, Judge.

Tbe defendant filed two pleas in bar of tbe foreclosure of tbe mortgage, both of wbieb were stricken. Tbe error assigned bere is tbe act of tbe judge in striking these pleas.

1. Tbe first was usury. The note, to secure which tbe mortgage was given, was made in 1871, and due in 1875. The mortgage was made in 1874, when there was in this state no limitation upon tbe rate of interest, and when tbe mortgage was executed it was agreed that interest should run at 10 per cent, from tbe maturity of tbe note. Ye think that *584this plea was properly stricken. The seal to the mortgage imports…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sivell v. HoganSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Van Dyke v. Van DykeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  3. Dannelly v. Cuthbert Oil Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  4. Brown v. NicholsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919
  5. Lindenberg v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API