Legal Opinion

Leet v. Totah

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 5, 1993No. 62, September Term, 1992PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RODOWSKY, Judge.

In this action alleging breach of a contract to sell land by the vendors’ refusal to convey, the purchaser obtained judgment for $15 million in expectation interest damages. A contract provision limited the purchaser’s remedies for the vendors’ default, “including failure to make full settlement,” either to specific performance or to rescission and return of the purchaser’s deposit. The circuit court ruled as a matter of law that the provision limiting remedies was void, as contrary to public policy, or, if not per se void, that the provision was inapplicable under the facts…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Campbell Soup Co. v. LojeskiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
  2. Prout v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  3. Maryland-National Capital Park & Planning Commission v. Washington National ArenaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  4. Higgins v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  5. Hyde Properties v. Clyde McCoy Will Luck, Trustee, United States of America, and Commissioner of Revenue for Tennessee, George M. Tidwell, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Reed v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  2. College of Notre Dame of Maryland, Inc. v. Morabito Consultants, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  3. Washington Mutual Bank v. HomanCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2009
  4. Merling v. MerlingCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  5. Patapsco Designs, Inc. v. Dominion Wireless, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API