Legal Opinion

Caeman v. Van Harke

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1885PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Error from Johnson District Court. ACTION brought by Mary Caeman and another against Lucy Van Harhe and five others, to set aside a certain will. Trial at the March Term, 1884, and judgment for defendants. The plaintiffs bring the case to this court. The opinion states the facts.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

JOHNSTON, J.:

Joseph Nan Harke, sr., died on the 13th day of March, 1883, leaving as his heirs at law, Lucy Nan Harke, his widow, and Charles Nan Harke, Joseph Nan Harke, jr., John Nan Harke, Susie Nan Harke, Mary Caeman and Lucy Jackson his children. On the 30th day of January, 1874, the decedent made and executed a will, with John Nun-nick and Peter Wertz as executors. On the 29th day of March, 1883, Lucy Nan Harke, the widow, appeared iu the probate court, and the will aforementioned having been produced, was then opened and read in the presence of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Waterman v. . WhitneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
  2. Jackson ex dem. Coe v. KniffenNew York Supreme Court · 1806
  3. Mooney v. OlsenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1879
  4. Rich v. BowkerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
  5. Fishburn v. JonesIndiana Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Cheever v. NorthMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Blackett v. ZieglerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  3. Crampton v. OsbornSupreme Court of Missouri · 1947
  4. Walton v. KendrickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  5. Dunsworth v. DunsworthSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API