Spabo v. United States Attorney General
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1DissentJordan, Circuit Judge
The question in this case is whether a narcotics conviction for violation of Fla. Stat. § 893.13(l)(a)(l) is an “aggravated felony” under the INA because it constitutes “illicit trafficking in a controlled substance (as defined in [21 U.S.C. § 802]), including a drug trafficking crime (as defined in [18 U.S.C. § 924(c) ]).” 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(B). The majority answers that question in the affirmative in part by blessing the BIA’s use of the so-called “modified categorical” approach. See Maj. Op. at 1177-78. ■
With respect, I dissent. In a published opinion issued just three years ago, we…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Moncrieffe v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Nijhawan v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Cheryl Cohen, on Behalf of Herself and Others Similarly Situated v. Office Depot, Inc., a Florida CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
- Dwight Dion Donawa v. U.S. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013
- Gregory L. Tippitt v. Reliance Standard Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.