Rentner v. Sigman
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBijur, J.
This is an application to continue a temporary injunction pendente lite in a suit brought by a manufacturer against a trade union of which some of his former employees are members. Upon the briefs and the somewhat extended argument With which I have been favored, I do not find any very serious disagreement between counsel as to the fundamental questions of law involved. It cannot be be gainsaid that in this State at least the right of employees to “ strike,” as it is ordinarily called, is established beyond question. (National Protective Assn. v. Cumming, 170 N. Y. 315; Bossert v. Dhuy, 221…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In Re DebsSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Duplex Printing Press Co. v. DeeringSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- American Steel Foundries v. Tri-City Central Trades CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- American Bank & Trust Co. v. Federal Reserve Bank of AtlantaSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- National Protective Ass'n of Steam Fitters & Helpers v. CummingNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Rentner v. SigmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926