Legal Opinion

Hunt v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1914No. 17,544PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from the district court for Furnas county: Robert C. Orr, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtFawcett, J.

From a judgment of the district court for Furnas county in favor of plaintiffs for damages to a shipment of horses over defendant’s railroad, defendant appeals.

The petition alleges that on March 14, 1911, plaintiff delivered 25 horses in good condition to defendant at Wilsonville, Nebraska, for shipment to Bristolville, Ohio, the shipment to be over defendant’s road from Wilsonville to Chicago; that in conveying the horses defendant operated *748its train in such, a careless and negligent manner that the horses were jammed, thrown about, etc., in such a manner that they were rendered…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Plaff v. Pacific Express Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad v. LawlerNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Nelson v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. DickinsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1874

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad Co. v. SizemoreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
  2. Billingsley v. McCormick Transfer Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Askey v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Merritt v. Ash Grove Lime & Portland Cement Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Whitla v. AlexanderNebraska Supreme Court · 1935

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API