Legal Opinion

Brewer v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided June 16, 1931No. 6 Div. 981PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SAMFORD, J.. It is first contended that the court erred in sustaining the state’s demurrer to defendant’s pléas of former jeopardy.

The rulings of the court on demurrer to plea 1 may be disposed of for the very obvious reason that the plea does not aver an abuse of the discretion placed in the trial judge by section 8696 of the Code of 1923. The statute fixes the reason for a discharge of the jury and of necessity leaves it to the opinion or discretion of the judge or court to determine whether or not the reason as fixed by law really exists. Andrews v. State, 174 Ala. 11, 56 So. 998, Ann.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Andrews v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  2. Spelce v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924
  3. Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1902
  4. Beason v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1912
  5. Storrs v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Duncan v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1942
  2. Rocker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1983
  3. Billups v. City of BirminghamCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1978
  4. Woods v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1978
  5. Hurt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API