Legal Opinion

People v. Superior Court (Clark)

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 28, 1994No. G014522PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

(Pen. Code, § 190.2, subd. (a)(17)(i) & (vii)) against the three “non-shooter defendants” on the ground that Proposition 115 could not be. applied to crimes committed after its passage but before the California Supreme Court’s decision in Yoshisato v. Superior Court (1992) 2 Cal.4th 978 [9 Cal.Rptr.2d 102, 831 P.2d 327] (which held Proposition 115 was effective). Because we conclude the provisions of Proposition 115 apply to crimes committed after its passage and before Yoshisato was decided, we grant the People’s petition and direct the trial court to deny the motion to dismiss.

I

Defend…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. People v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Carlos v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  4. People v. WhartonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Tapia v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. HoyosCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1995
  3. Saul v. Lineage Logistics Services LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API