Legal Opinion

Mills v. Richardson

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 8, 1972No. Civ. A. 71-416PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GOURLEY, Senior District Judge:

This Complaint has been filed to obtain judicial review of the dismissal by defendant of plaintiff’s claim for child’s disability benefits under the Social Secu rity Act. Jurisdiction is asserted to exist pursuant to 42 U.S.C.A. § 405(g). The immediate matter before the Court is defendant’s Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Defendant’s position, very simply stated, is that there is no jurisdiction in this Court because there has been no final decision as required by 42 U.S.C.A. § 405(g). This position is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Oveta Culp Hobby, Secretary of Department of Health, Education and Welfare v. Joseph HodgesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
  2. Staskel v. GardnerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1967
  3. Kennedy v. FinchDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1970
  4. Piper v. RichardsonDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1970
  5. Rushing v. FinchDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Brittingham v. WeinbergerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Raymond A. Neighbors v. Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
  3. Cunningham v. RichardsonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Pinkowski v. CalifanoDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1979
  5. Carney v. CalifanoDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API