Legal Opinion

Banzer v. Banzer

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1894PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Action by Ellen Banzer against Adam. Banzer and others for partition. Complaint dismissed.

1Opinion of the CourtPryor, J.

In a suit for partition the case is this: John Maier and Michael Banzer were tenants in common. Maier conveyed his undivided moiety to Susanna, the wife of Banzer. Then Banzer executed a will disposing of his property, in these words:

“First after all my lawful debts are paid and discharged I give and bequeath to my beloved wife, Susanna Banzer, all my real and personal estate now at present and hereafter in my possession; my real estate consisting at present of a part of a house known by the number 220 West Thirty-second street, Twentieth Ward, so as described in the deed of said house; and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Roseboom v. . RoseboomNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  2. Stelz v. . ShreckNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Van Horne v. . CampbellNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  4. Campbell v. . BeaumontNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  5. Bramberry's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sasso v. Meacham Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API