Legal Opinion
Banzer v. Banzer
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 15, 1894PublishedCited by 1 opinion
Action by Ellen Banzer against Adam. Banzer and others for partition. Complaint dismissed.
1Opinion of the CourtPryor, J.
In a suit for partition the case is this: John Maier and Michael Banzer were tenants in common. Maier conveyed his undivided moiety to Susanna, the wife of Banzer. Then Banzer executed a will disposing of his property, in these words:
“First after all my lawful debts are paid and discharged I give and bequeath to my beloved wife, Susanna Banzer, all my real and personal estate now at present and hereafter in my possession; my real estate consisting at present of a part of a house known by the number 220 West Thirty-second street, Twentieth Ward, so as described in the deed of said house; and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Roseboom v. . RoseboomNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Stelz v. . ShreckNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Van Horne v. . CampbellNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Campbell v. . BeaumontNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Bramberry's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Sasso v. Meacham Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934