Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

State v. Tominiko

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided August 26, 2011No. SCWC-29535Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Concurring and Dissenting Opinion by

ACOBA, J.

While I concur with the majority’s analysis on the suppression issue,1 the premier ques*82tion in this case, as in every case, is whether jurisdiction exists. Inasmuch as in the absence of an allegation that operation of the vehicle was on a public way, Count I, charging Operating a Vehicle Under the Influence of an Intoxicant (OVUII), Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) § 291E-61(a)(l) and/or (a)(3) (Supp. 2008),2 cannot be viewed as charging an offense, see State v. Wheeler, 121 Hawai'i 383,219 P.3d 1170 (2009),3 and accompanying Count III cannot supply…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. People v. HarveyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. State v. LopezHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. JendruschHawaii Supreme Court · 1977
  4. State v. WheelerHawaii Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State v. EstradaHawaii Supreme Court · 1987

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API