Legal Opinion

Cress v. Scott

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided January 18, 1994No. 21205PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RANSOM, Chief Justice.

Tom Cress appeals from the grant of a partial summary judgment against him and in favor of Robert Scott, doing business as Western Auto Electric. Based on its reading of the New Mexico uniform jury instructions, the trial court dismissed Cress’s claim for loss-of-use damages in his suit for breach of an automobile repair contract. We reverse.

Facts. In June 1988, Cress purchased a used Maserati automobile for use in his insurance sales business. Cress drove the vehicle to and from work for approximately one and one-half years. On January 10,1990, the vehicle would…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Fredenburgh v. Allied Van Lines, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co. v. Elk Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1950
  3. Curtis v. Schwartzman Packing CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1956
  4. McConal Aviation, Inc. v. Commercial Aviation InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Earl Williams Const. Co. v. Thornton & Brooks, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. McNeill v. Burlington Resource Oil & Gas Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Behrens v. Gateway Court, LLCNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. Santa Fe Southern Railway, Inc. v. Baucis Limited Liability Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Fukida v. Hon/Hawaii Service and RepairHawaii Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Hubbard v. Albuquerque Truck Center, Ltd.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API