Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided July 17, 1986No. 67039Published

1Opinion of the Court

McDONALD, Chief Justice.

The following question has been certified as being of great public importance:

May the harmless error rule be applied in a case involving an impermissible comment on the defendant’s right to remain silent?

Smith v. State, 467 So.2d 501, 501 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985). We have jurisdiction pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(4), Florida Constitution. In State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986), we answered virtually the identical question in the affirmative. We therefore quash the instant decision and remand to the district court for reconsideration in light of DiGuilio.

It…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. DiGuilioSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  2. Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API