Legal Opinion

Weinman Pump Mfg. Co. v. Cline

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 28, 1962No. 6439PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDueey, J.

The plaintiff, appellant herein, a manufacturing concern in the city of Columbus, was having part of its property appropriated for inclusion in an expressway project, and it entered into a contract with, the defendant, appellee herein, to purchase property owned by him.

The plaintiff states this property “ * '* * was and is situated immediately west of other lands owned by the plaintiff and was situated approximately in the center of an area which the plaintiff was under great need and compulsion to acquire if it was to continue in business at its present location, * '*

According to the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Grundstein v. Suburban Motor Freight, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1952
  2. Findley v. DavisOhio Court of Appeals · 1955
  3. Alms & Doepke Co. v. YoungOhio Court of Appeals · 1935
  4. Rosenberg v. CallamOhio Court of Appeals · 1942

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Fraternal Order of Police, Ohio Labor Council, Inc. v. SidneyOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Capps v. Georgia Pacific CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Capps v. Georgia Pacific CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API