Legal Opinion

People v. Maliszewski

New York Court of Appeals

Decided September 3, 2009PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Defendant pleaded guilty to burglary and was sentenced pursuant to a plea agreement the Appellate Division found in a prior order to be illegal. He was offered the chance to withdraw his plea by the sentencing court, and chose not to do so. The sentencing court was not required to offer defendant the option of a lesser sentence, where plea withdrawal can put the defendant in the position he was in prior to admitting guilt (compare People v Selikoff, 35 NY2d 227 [1974], with People v McConnell, 49 NY2d 340…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. SelikoffNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. People v. McConnellNew York Court of Appeals · 1980

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. PettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API