Legal Opinion

Pritchard v. Neal

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 9, 1976No. 52397PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stolz, Judge.

The plaintiff, a diabetic, was advised by the defendant doctors, who were partners in Macon, Georgia, that another pregnancy would be dangerous. Therefore, on the defendants’ recommendation a tubal ligation was allegedly performed on March 29, 1972. In the latter months of 1972, the plaintiff became pregnant. All other facts are disputed.

The plaintiff claims that the defendants fraudulently misrepresented material facts concerning the success of tubal ligations and thus did not receive her informed consent. She also claimed that the defendants were negligent in ligating only one…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kenney v. Piedmont HospitalCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  2. Norton v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
  3. Tipton v. HardenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  4. Dickerson v. HulseyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Church v. PeralesCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
  2. Leagan v. LevineCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  3. Overstreet v. NickelsenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
  4. White v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1981
  5. Spikes v. HeathCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API