Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Johnson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 7, 1992No. 92-1668Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partGlickstein, Chief Judge

This is a pro se appeal from the summary denial of appellant’s motion for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 3.850, and the denial of his motion for rehearing. The motion alleged nine grounds, including: (3) involuntariness of plea, and ineffectiveness of trial counsel due to counsel’s failure to investigate the defense of involuntary intoxication, and (6) ineffective assistance of counsel due to counsel’s failure to advise of possible defense of involuntary intoxication. I concur that most of appellant’s claims do not warrant reversal; however,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McCoy v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  2. Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API